Skip to content

i18n(ja): restore lost code fences (batch 3, 33 files) - #23511

Merged
qiancai merged 1 commit into
i18n-ja-release-8.5from
i18n-ja-lost-code-fences-sweep-batch3
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

i18n(ja): restore lost code fences (batch 3, 33 files)#23511
qiancai merged 1 commit into
i18n-ja-release-8.5from
i18n-ja-lost-code-fences-sweep-batch3

Conversation

@yahonda

@yahonda yahonda commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)

Batch 3 of the corpus-wide lost-code-fences sweep (see #23505 and #23506 for batch 1/2 context): restores triple-backtick code fences that were dropped by the original MT translation, across DM guides, TiUP deployment/scaling guides, and sql-statements/sql-statement-*.md pages. 33 files, each verified against the English source for both fence count and per-line indentation (including list-nested and blockquote-nested fences).

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v9.0 (TiDB 9.0 versions)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

AI agent involvement

  • The changes in this PR were primarily made by an AI agent on behalf of the PR author.

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

Restores triple-backtick code fences dropped by the original MT
translation across DM guides, deployment/scale guides, and
sql-statement pages, matching the English source's fence positions
and indentation exactly.
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 13, 2026
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign hfxsd for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: c12b31d5-30f6-42b9-a0a3-66da1bb88def

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 13, 2026
@yahonda
yahonda marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2026 01:06
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 13, 2026
yahonda added a commit to yahonda/docs that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Found via a deeper content-level indentation check (comparing every
line inside every fenced block against the English source, not just
the fence markers themselves) run while reviewing this PR:

- pd-control.md: 8 closing/opening brace lines inside JSON example
  blocks ended up mis-indented by this batch's own fix pass (some were
  already correctly indented before this batch touched the file and
  got de-indented in the process; others were left with a stale
  leading indent on just the first line of a block). All now match
  the English source's indentation exactly.
- performance-tuning-methods.md: fix one missing を particle
  (`close`呼び出します -> `close`を呼び出します) found in the same file
  while re-checking it.

Verified via an exhaustive fenced-block content diff against the
English source across all 37 files in this PR: 0 remaining mismatches.
Also verified no merge conflicts against the other open
i18n-ja-release-8.5 PRs (pingcap#23509, pingcap#23511, pingcap#23512).
@qiancai qiancai added translation/no-need No need to translate this PR. and removed missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. labels Aug 13, 2026
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added the needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. label Aug 13, 2026
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2026-08-13 03:14:39.337763843 +0000 UTC m=+3275465.373858909: ☑️ agreed by qiancai.

@qiancai
qiancai merged commit b3b620e into i18n-ja-release-8.5 Aug 13, 2026
5 of 9 checks passed
@qiancai
qiancai deleted the i18n-ja-lost-code-fences-sweep-batch3 branch August 13, 2026 03:14
yahonda added a commit to yahonda/docs that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Found via user spot-checks across the current i18n-ja-release-8.5
branch; fixed every confirmed defect and swept the corpus for
recurrences of each pattern.

- Restore literal English SQL function names in headings that had
  been mistranslated as Japanese prose (SLEEP() -> 寝る(), VALUES() ->
  値(), CASE -> 場合, IF() -> もし(), and 15 more across
  miscellaneous-functions.md, information-functions.md, and
  control-flow-functions.md). Verified corpus-wide via an anchor-based
  heading comparison against the English source: 0 remaining
  instances of this pattern after the fix.
- Fix 3 missing が particles after code-span identifiers
  (string-functions.md x2, partitioned-table.md) and one misplaced を
  particle (encryption-at-rest.md's --s3.sse argument).
- Fix a meaning-inverting heading/sentence in partitioned-table.md
  ("partitioned table" -> "partitioned table" instead of "partitioned
  table" -> "non-partitioned table").
- Unify "rotate the master key" heading to ローテーションする, matching
  the ロ​ーテーション term used in the very next sentence and dominant
  throughout the rest of the corpus (回転させる was a self-contradicting
  outlier).
- Restore 4 more lost code fences in pd-control.md that a previous
  batch (pingcap#23506) missed, and fix newly-discovered lost fences in
  performance-tuning-methods.md (3), performance-tuning-overview.md
  (1, plus translating its formula to match the rest of the file),
  pipelined-dml.md (1), and performance-schema-session-connect-attrs.md
  (2) -- none of which were in the original corpus-wide sweep list,
  suggesting daily syncs keep reintroducing this defect in newly
  translated content.
- Unify 5 inconsistent renderings of the "Queries Using Plan Cache
  OPS" Grafana panel name in performance-tuning-methods.md to the one
  form the sync bot itself already left correctly in English.

Verified no merge conflicts against all other open i18n-ja-release-8.5
PRs (pingcap#23506, pingcap#23509, pingcap#23511).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. translation/no-need No need to translate this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants