Skip to content

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0 - #2189

Draft
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client
Draft

Bump esplora-client to v0.13.0#2189
luisschwab wants to merge 1 commit into
bitcoindevkit:masterfrom
luisschwab:feat/bump-esplora-client

Conversation

@luisschwab

@luisschwab luisschwab commented Apr 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TBD

@oleonardolima

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

ping @luisschwab
Could you update to use the latest esplora-client master ?
I think there's something broken that VM's mentioned in the last call.

@luisschwab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

It seems get_block_infos (plural) is missing, we only have get_block_info (singular).

@luisschwab
luisschwab force-pushed the feat/bump-esplora-client branch 3 times, most recently from ed15929 to 06b52ed Compare June 15, 2026 18:13
@bitcoindevkit bitcoindevkit deleted a comment from codecov Bot Jun 15, 2026
@luisschwab

luisschwab commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

It seems that bitreq doesn't properly support a WASM transport. We may need to hold off on bumping it here until that is addressed.

We can make a 0.13.1 point release once bitreq gets this sorted out.

cc @oleonardolima

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.65%. Comparing base (023fdf0) to head (8deea92).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2189   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.65%   78.65%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        5909     5909           
  Branches      279      279           
=======================================
  Hits         4648     4648           
  Misses       1185     1185           
  Partials       76       76           
Flag Coverage Δ
rust 78.65% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants