Skip to content

Verify 209-CAB-48 (1 items) - #70

Closed
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
inv/issue-65
Closed

Verify 209-CAB-48 (1 items)#70
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
inv/issue-65

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Aug 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Verification pass from the issue form.

field value
location 209-CAB-48 — Cabinet 48
confirmed present 1
marked missing 0
verified_by maddybernstein
last_verified 2026-08-06

Filed by @maddybernstein in #65.

Editing that issue rebuilds this branch from scratch, so any commits pushed here by hand would be discarded — make corrections in the issue, or merge and follow up separately.

Closes #65

Applied from issue #65 by the issue-to-pr workflow.
@github-actions
github-actions Bot requested review from kubu4 and sr320 as code owners August 6, 2026 21:16
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2026
@sr320

sr320 commented Aug 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closing this unmerged — it would recreate the data damage it's failing on, rather than fix it.

This branch was cut from a main that already contained the rows it adds. Its diff is pure additions, so merging it would duplicate itm-00114itm-00122 and locations 209-CAB-48 / 209-CAB-49. That's what the 18 duplicate-id errors in the red check are reporting — the check ran against the merge result, not against this branch alone.

It would also move data backwards. main currently has:

itm-00114,Glass filter supplies,...,present,2026-08-06,maddybernstein

and this PR re-adds it as unverified,2021-08-29.

Rebasing wouldn't help much: the branch's whole contribution is rows that already exist, so there'd be nothing left of it. Regenerating is cleaner.

What happens next: #72 repairs the duplicate rows already on main. Once that lands, issue #65 can be re-triggered and issue-to-pr will build a correct branch from the fixed base. Issue #65 stays open — closing this PR doesn't close it.

Root cause is tracked in #72: a PR opened with GITHUB_TOKEN doesn't trigger validate.yml, so nothing re-validates a bot branch at merge time and a stale one can land dirty.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Verify a location

1 participant